Experts: Billing of Foreign Students a Gray Area

July 22, 2019

Long before recruiting and enrolling foreign students emerged in the last decade as a significant tool for helping close strained budgets at institutions of higher education in the United States, Alabama State University (ASU) was among dozens who had built a noted history of welcoming foreign students to its campus.

Students from so-called Third World and lesser developed or war torn countries got extra attention and help as part of American outreach.

ASU recruited prospects with sales pitches about its teaching staff, educational and athletic opportunities and proud legacy since its founding just after the Civil War.

Historical high points aside, the institution was recently beginning to show signs of recovering from its drama-filled chapter of leadership turmoil at the top. Then, since this past spring, another potentially embarrassing situation is raising eyebrows and turning heads.

A group of ASU students from Nigeria are suing the university over how it used funds their government paid the institution for their educational opportunity.

The federal lawsuit contends the university overpriced many of its services — from classes to housing and food — and did not refund the Nigerian government the money ASU should have had left over had the charges been reasonable nor has it credited the country for the disputed amounts the litigants contend should go toward the costs of future enrollees from Nigeria.

Alabama State does not comment on legal matters involving it that are pending before a court, ASU spokesman Kenneth Mullinax said when asked recently for the institution’s take on the surprising charge against it.

Officials at several other institutions around the country expressed surprise over such a claim hastening to add they could not offer any comment of substance about the ASU case or its potential impact on higher education.

The litigation, supported by current and former Nigerians who are related to ASU and the lawsuit, apparently faces a tough road ahead.

The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on College (SASCOC) has no standards in its code of conduct governing what price institutions can charge students. What an institution charges is its business, said an SACSCOC official.

Johnny L. Taylor Jr., chief executive officer of Washington, D.C.-based Thurgood Marshall College Fund, offered more thoughts on the question.

“Understanding higher education financial accounting is very complicated and nuanced,” said Taylor, whose organization raises funds across the nation to pay for African-Americans to attend historically Black colleges and universities such as ASU.

“From the outside, what may appear to be a disparity, may not be,” said Taylor, stressing he knows nothing of the details of the lawsuit beyond reports of the filing of the lawsuit. “We shouldn’t jump to conclusions because people oversimplify higher education budgets.”

There are some sponsored college scholarships that provide for scholarship recipients to pocket any overage in the amount of their aid, said Taylor. Most institutions in the United States charge more for out of state students than in-state, he said. It may be even more for out of country enrollees, he noted.

“There is no blanket rule,” on college costs, Taylor said. It all “depends,” he said, on the institution and the sponsor.

The court case against comes as enrollment of foreign students at American institutions has soared in the past decade, statistics from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies suggest.

A Homeland Security agency report issued in 2015 showed foreign student enrollment in U.S. colleges and universities had risen to 1.1 million students, up 14 percent from the previous year and 50 percent higher than 2005, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

While foreign student enrollment in U.S. institutions of higher learning has for years far exceeded the count of Americans studying abroad, the Wall Street Journal report said the government credited the recent surge to arrival of more Chinese students from affluent homes and students from oil-rich nations in the Persian Gulf region.

The enrollment surge is not likely to be significantly affected by the ASU litigation, absent some major turn of events against the university, observers said.

Source: Diverse (Issues In Higher Education)

Related News

Thurgood Marshall College Fund partnering with Chipotle in June to create impact for students

In observance of Juneteenth, Chipotle Mexican Grill has selected the Thurgood Marshall College Fund (TMCF) to benefit from a donation round-up from June 15-21. Chipotle patrons in the United States can round-up their order total to the next highest dollar amount on the Chipotle app and Chiptole.com to support TMCF, its students and member institutions.  […]

Thurgood Marshall College Fund board chair shared financial expertise with national media outlets

The chair for the Thurgood Marshall College Fund (TMCF) Board of Directors recently shared her deep expertise in finance with Bloomberg and MS NOW.  Racquel Oden, chair of the TMCF board and HSBC’s head of international wealth and premier banking, and head of global private banking, spoke about corporate earnings driving the market on Bloomberg’s […]

Thurgood Marshall College Fund SOAR program set to begin on 16 campuses 

The Thurgood Marshall College Fund (TMCF) SOAR (Seeking, Observing and Achieving Results) program expanded to 16 campuses this summer, with activities beginning on the last day of May and continuing through July. SOAR began in 2024 on the campuses of four historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).   The SOAR program provides high school juniors and […]